Abubakar, A. Douglas, S & Sani, Z (2018). Qualitative data collection, analysis and interpretation in research paradigms: The case of library and information science research. Applied Scientific Research. 6 (5): 211-215
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press, pp.1–18.
Baker, S.E. and Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. [online] Available at: https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf.
Bali, M and Zamora, M. (2022). Intentionally Equitable Hospitality as Critical Instructional Design. In Quinn, J., Fay Burtis, M., Jhangiani, S. and Denial, Catherine J. Designing for Care. Hybrid Pedagogy Incorporated.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.
British Educational Research Association (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. 4th ed. [online] London: British Educational Research Association. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018-online.
Chubb, J., Cowling, P. and Reed, D. (2021). Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI & SOCIETY, (37).
Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th anniversary ed. New York: Continuum.
Hanington, B, & Martin, B (2012), Universal Methods of Design : 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions, Quarto Publishing Group USA, Osceola.
Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), pp.497–518.
Koshy, E., Koshy, V. and Waterman, H. (2011). Action Research in Healthcare. London: SAGE .
Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus groups: a Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Kwon, D. (2022). The rise of citational justice: how scholars are making references fairer. Nature, [online] 603(7902), pp.568–571.
Lipmanowicz, K.M., Henri (n.d.). Liberating Structures – 1. 1-2-4-All. [online] www.liberatingstructures.com. Available at: https://www.liberatingstructures.com/1-1-2-4-all/.
Martin, F. & Bolliger, D. (2018) Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning Journal, 22 (1) p219
Negrin, K. A., Slaughter, S. E., Dahlke, S., & Olson, J. (2022). Successful Recruitment to Qualitative Research: A Critical Reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21.
Sim, J. and Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: Some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, [online] 53(6), pp.3003–3022. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5.
Statistics Solutions. (2020). What is the Difference between Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis? [online] Available at: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/what-is-the-difference-between-content-analysis-and-thematic-analysis/.
TED-Ed (2017). How do focus groups work? – Hector Lanz. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TwgVQIZPsw. [Accessed: 7/10/23]
Templin, C. (2021) Why Citation matters: Ideas on a feminist approach to research. Blog ABV Gender- und Diversitykompetenz FU Berlin.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Why use focus group interviews in educational and psychological research?. In Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology (pp. 12-21). SAGE Publications, Inc.
White, J. (2023). ‘CAD CLUB: A reflection on the development of inclusive e-learning resources.’ Unpublished. Available at: https://jameswhitepgcert.myblog-staging.arts.ac.uk/files/2023/11/James-White-IP-Artefact-Relfective-Report.pdf
